Is Gordon Brown just a very confused Robin Hood?

December 12, 2009 by admin · 12 Comments
Filed under: Government 
home furnishing
LadyMoon asked:


Robin Hood robbed from the rich to feed the poor.

Gordon Brown taxes the hell out of the poorest and lowest paid workers (abolishing the 10p tax) so that he and his already fat-salaried MPs can have their £20,000 “second home allowances” and furnish lavish expenses claims for the affluent lifestyles.

Talking about robbing from the bloody poor to feed the rich!

Possibly Related Posts:


what do you think of the british ministers getting their tv licence and council tax paid for them?

December 11, 2009 by admin · 12 Comments
Filed under: Government 
home furnishing
lorne asked:


and a hoard of other things eg. money to furnish their second homes.i would like to tell you what i think but i think yahoo would bar me for life

Possibly Related Posts:


How about President Obama’s first 100 days?

September 12, 2009 by admin · 10 Comments
Filed under: Government 
Home Furnishings
2010 and do it again asked:


WASHINGTON — As he entered office, President Barack Obama made a symbolic bow to frugality, putting off the costly redecorating of the Oval Office that his predecessors had done.

But if the furnishings have remained largely the same — right down to the stain on the big oval rug — the way Obama looks and acts there is decidedly different from his predecessor, not to mention all those who went before.

At the 100-day mark, he’s putting his own style on the presidency. Opportunistic. Pragmatic. Confident. Deliberate. Polite to friend and foe alike. Partisan. Polarizing. A better talker than George W. Bush . A more disciplined manager than Bill Clinton .

Some traits he’ll maintain throughout his presidency. Some could change over his term. John F. Kennedy grew skeptical after a disastrous invasion of Cuba early in his presidency, learning to challenge aides and adopting an executive style that saw him and the country through a nuclear showdown with the Soviet Union .

“He’s flexible,” George Edwards , a scholar of the presidency and currently a visiting fellow at Oxford University , said of Obama. “He’s still learning.”

Nothing defines his early days as much as the way he’s seized the political opportunity provided by economic crisis to push forward an ambitious liberal agenda that otherwise would have little chance of getting through Congress . It includes an explosion of federal spending, the groundwork for universal health care and broad regulation of the environment, and soaring deficits and debt.

Even before he took office, Obama knew he faced a rare moment of crisis — one when a president could push through an agenda dramatically changing the government, and perhaps the country itself.

Franklin D. Roosevelt did it in 1933 at the height of the Great Depression. Lyndon Johnson did it in 1964-65 in the aftermath of Kennedy’s assassination. Ronald Reagan did it in the early 1980s at a peak of the Cold War and economic stagflation. George W. Bush did it after the 2001 terrorist attacks.

Shifting priorities to push through his massive package of spending surges and tax cuts — many already on his or the Democratic agenda — was pivotal, because it’s unclear how much Obama could get through Congress absent the crisis. Those who counseled him to wait on the big programmatic priorities and focus first only on fighting the economic downturn misunderstood that, but Obama got it.

As he seeks to get his way, at home and abroad, Obama’s demonstrated a penchant for working people one on one, apparently confident that he can win over anyone.

While he may be laying the groundwork for more civil relations with Republicans and legislative successes later, he won only three Republican Senate votes for his stimulus package and none in the House of Representatives , none from either chamber for his budget, and he also failed to convince European leaders to send combat troops to help in Afghanistan .

“He has a difficult time persuading people,” Edwards said. “He’s been very good at maintaining his coalition. What he can’t do is bring other people in.”

A careful and deliberate communicator, Obama relies on the teleprompter more than any other president. When he speaks off the cuff, such as at town hall meetings, he often pauses as though he’s searching for precisely the right words.

Communication skills are important — Bush was so bad he joked that his mouth was where words went to die. But they alone cannot change the landscape. “What they can do is recognize and exploit opportunities,” Edwards said. “It’s not the same as creating opportunities.”

What Obama says is easily more important than how he says it.

For example, he’s shown a readiness to be pragmatic on some things as he’s transitioned from campaigning to governing.

Examples:

— After talking to commanders, he slowed his proposed drawdown of troops from Iraq .

— Heading to Turkey in search of help with the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan , he dropped a campaign pledge to say the killing of Armenians nearly a century ago was genocide.

— To the dismay of liberals, he echoed Bush and argued that national security was threatened by two lawsuits alleging the torture of a suspected terrorist and the warrantless surveillance of two American attorneys and an Islamic charity.

Obama, like most who come to the office, is sure of himself. One example is his willingness to admit a mistake, such as when Tom Daschle , his nominee to be secretary of Health and Human Services , was forced to withdraw after being caught in a tax mess. “I screwed up,” Obama said.

Another is his recent speech at Georgetown University explaining why he was trying to do so many things at once, using a Biblical metaphor to say he wanted to make sure the nation’s house was built on a solid foundation, on rock instead of sand.

“The Obama team sensed that the message of him trying to do too much was starting to catch on,” said Bruce Buchanan , a political

Possibly Related Posts:


MPs expenses - would you?

August 5, 2009 by admin · 10 Comments
Filed under: Government 
Home Furnishings
Kier asked:


If you were in a job, any job, and you could quite legally claim expenses for a second home and furnishings etc etc. would you?
I’m probably gonna be hated for this but I’m gonna be honest and say that I would.

Possibly Related Posts:


How much money does the Federal Australian Government spend on furnishing, holidays, flights ect?

April 17, 2009 by admin · 3 Comments
Filed under: Government 
furnishing
Andrew asked:


Any websites that detail this would be great.

Possibly Related Posts: